RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Hydroxyurea to prevent brain injury in children with sickle cell disease (HU Prevent)-A randomized, placebo-controlled phase II feasibility/pilot study
Casella, J. F., Furstenau, D. K., Adams, R. J., Brambilla, D. J., Lebensburger, J. D., Fehr, J. J., Jordan, L. C., King, A. A., Ichord, R. N., McKinstry, R. C., Kraut, M. A., Shaw, D. W., White, D. A., Whyte-Stewart, D. A., Avadhani, R., Barron-Casella, E. A., Cannon, A. D., Eaton, C. K., Riekert, K. A., ... Hanley, D. F. (2024). Hydroxyurea to prevent brain injury in children with sickle cell disease (HU Prevent)-A randomized, placebo-controlled phase II feasibility/pilot study. American Journal of Hematology, 99(10), 1906-1916. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27423
Central nervous system (CNS) injury is common in sickle cell disease (SCD) and occurs early in life. Hydroxyurea is safe and efficacious for treatment of SCD, but high-quality evidence from randomized trials to estimate its neuroprotective effect is scant. HU Prevent was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, phase II feasibility/pilot trial of dose-escalated hydroxyurea vs. placebo for the primary prevention of CNS injury in children with HbSS or HbS-beta(0)-thalassemia subtypes of SCD age 12-48 months with normal neurological examination, MRI of the brain, and cerebral blood flow velocity. We hypothesized that hydroxyurea would reduce by 50% the incidence of CNS injury. Two outcomes were compared: primary-a composite of silent cerebral infarction, elevated cerebral blood flow velocity, transient ischemic attack, or stroke; secondary-a weighted score estimating the risk of suffering the consequences of stroke (the Stroke Consequences Risk Score-SCRS), based on the same outcome events. Six participants were randomized to each group. One participant in the hydroxyurea group had a primary outcome vs. four in the placebo group (incidence rate ratio [90% CI] 0.216 [0.009, 1.66], p = .2914) (similar to 80% reduction in the hydroxyurea group). The mean SCRS score was 0.078 (SD 0.174) in the hydroxyurea group, 0.312 (SD 0.174) in the placebo group, p = .072, below the p-value of .10 often used to justify subsequent phase III investigations. Serious adverse events related to study procedures occurred in 3/41 MRIs performed, all related to sedation. These results suggest that hydroxyurea may have profound neuroprotective effect in children with SCD and support a definitive phase III study to encourage the early use of hydroxyurea in all infants with SCD.