RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Hospital healthcare resource utilization and associated hospital costs of patients with lupus nephritis in China
A National Administrative Claim Database study
He, X., Zhu, X., Tang, Z., Gairy, K., Juliao, P., Wu, Z., & Han, S. (2024). Hospital healthcare resource utilization and associated hospital costs of patients with lupus nephritis in China: A National Administrative Claim Database study. Value in Health Regional Issues, 43, Article 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101001
Objectives: Assess hospital healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated hospital costs of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) in China and compare these outcomes with a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort (SLE with/without LN) as well as exploring the effect of end -stage kidney disease (ESKD). Methods: This retrospective administrative claims -based analysis identi fied patients with SLE and SLE with LN from China using diagnosis codes and keywords. Patients with LN were subcategorized by presence of ESKD. Outcomes included allcause and disease -speci fic HCRU (de fined as healthcare visits including inpatient and outpatient visits) and medical costs (in 2022 US dollars). Results: In total, 3645 patients with SLE were included, of whom 404 (11%) had LN. Among those with LN, 142 (35%) had ESKD. Median (interquartile range) all -cause healthcare visits per patient per month (PPPM) was signi ficantly greater for patients with LN (2.08 [4.011) vs SLE (0.92 [1.641; P < .0001). Patients with LN and ESKD (3.00 [4.181) had numerically more all -cause healthcare visits PPPM compared with LN patients without ESKD (1.50 [3.451). Median all -cause costs PPPM were signi ficantly greater among patients with LN ($287.46 [477.151) vs SLE ($113.09 [267.391; P < .0001) and numerically higher for patients with LN and ESKD ($466.29 [958.901) vs LN without ESKD ($223.50 [319.561). Conclusions: Chinese patients with LN had greater HCRU and hospital healthcare costs compared with the general SLE cohort. This burden was higher for those with ESKD. These data highlight the substantial HCRU among patients with LN in China, especially those with ESKD, suggesting the need for early diagnosis and timely management of LN to mitigate the economic burden.