RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Treatment patterns and health care resource utilization among Japanese patients with ankylosing spondylitis
A hospital claims database analysis
Tomita, T., Sato, M., Esterberg, E., Parikh, R. C., Hagimori, K., & Nakajo, K. (2021). Treatment patterns and health care resource utilization among Japanese patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A hospital claims database analysis. Modern Rheumatology, 31(2), 431-441. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2020.1775927
Objectives: To understand the current state of treatment patterns and health care resource utilization among patients in Japan with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) managed in the real-world setting.
Methods: Patient records from the Medical Data Vision database were analyzed to identify patients with ICD-10 AS from April 2009 through July 2017. Measures evaluated included demographic, clinical, and other characteristics at diagnosis; treatment patterns; health care resource utilization; and costs.
Results: Four hundred and seventeen patients met the study's inclusion criteria. Treatments observed during the first year after the initial AS diagnosis included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (79.6%), corticosteroids (39.3%), methotrexate (22.3%), sulfasalazine (16.8%), adalimumab (14.2%), and infliximab (12.2%). At any time during the mean 33 months of study follow-up, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were initiated by 115 patients. During the study follow-up, patients who initiated bDMARDs had higher median total per-patient annual health care costs ($26,937 vs $15,323), lower median per-patient hospitalization costs ($29,817 vs. $39,509), and fewer median hospital days per admission (7.0 vs. 11.0 days) compared with the overall group of patients diagnosed with AS.
Conclusion: This database study provides knowledge of patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs for patients with AS in Japan. The study outcomes demonstrate a need for increased awareness of proper AS management.