RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum
A systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature
Kowitt, S. D., Ellis, K. R., Carlisle, V., Bhushan, N. L., Black, K. Z., Brodar, K., Cranley, N. M., Davis, K. L., Eng, E., Martin, M. Y., McGuirt, J., Sokol, R. L., Tang, P. Y., Vines, A. I., Walker, J. S., & Fisher, E. B. (2019). Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: A systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4
OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests peer support (PS) is as an effective strategy for enhancing prevention and control of chronic and infectious diseases, including cancer. This systematic scoping review examines the range and variety of interventions on the use of PS across the cancer care continuum.
METHOD: We used a broad definition of PS to capture a wide-range of interventions and characterize the current status of the field. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published from January 2011 to June 2016. We screened the title and abstracts of 2087 articles, followed by full-text screening of 420 articles, resulting in a final sample of 242 articles of which the most recent 100 articles were reviewed (published June 2014 to May 2016).
RESULTS: A number of the recent intervention studies focused on breast cancer (32%, breast cancer only) or multiple cancer sites (23%). Although the interventions spanned all phases of the cancer care continuum, only 2% targeted end-of-life care. Seventy-six percent focused on clinical outcomes (e.g., screening, treatment adherence) and 72% on reducing health disparities. Interventions were primarily phone-based (44%) or delivered in a clinic setting (44%). Only a few studies (22%) described the impact of providing PS on peer supporters.
CONCLUSION: PS appears to be a widely used approach to address needs across the cancer care continuum, with many opportunities to expand its reach.