RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Associations of the neighborhood built environment with gestational weight gain
Grobman, W. A., Crenshaw, E. G., Marsh, D. J., McNeil, R. B., Pemberton, V. L., Haas, D. M., Debbink, M., Mercer, B. M., Parry, S., Reddy, U., Saade, G., Simhan, H., Mukhtar, F., Wing, D. A., Kershaw, K. N., & NICHD nuMoM2b NHLBI nuMoM2b Heart Health Study Networks (2023). Associations of the neighborhood built environment with gestational weight gain. American Journal of Perinatology, (6). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730363
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether specific factors of the built environment related to physical activity and diet are associated with inadequate and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG).
STUDY DESIGN: This analysis is based on data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-To-Be, a prospective cohort of nulliparous women who were followed from the beginning of their pregnancies through delivery. At each study visit, home addresses were recorded and geocoded. Locations were linked to several built-environment characteristics such as the census tract National Walkability Score (the 2010 Walkability Index) and the number of gyms, parks, and grocery stores within a 3-km radius of residential address. The primary outcome of GWG (calculated as the difference between prepregnancy weight and weight at delivery) was categorized as inadequate, appropriate, or excessive based on weight gained per week of gestation. Multinomial regression (generalized logit) models evaluated the relationship between each factor in the built environment and excessive or inadequate GWG.
RESULTS: Of the 8,182 women in the analytic sample, 5,819 (71.1%) had excessive GWG, 1,426 (17.4%) had appropriate GWG, and 937 (11.5%) had inadequate GWG. For the majority of variables examined, built environments more conducive to physical activity and healthful food availability were associated with a lower odds of excessive or inadequate GWG category. For example, a higher number of gyms or parks within 3 km of a participant's residential address was associated with lower odds of having excessive (gyms: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.93 [0.89-0.96], parks: 0.94 [0.90-0.98]) or inadequate GWG (gyms: 0.91 [0.86-0.96]; parks: 0.91 [0.86-0.97]). Similarly, a higher number of grocery stores was associated with lower odds of having excessive GWG (0.94 [0.91-0.97]).
CONCLUSION: Among a diverse population of nulliparous women, multiple aspects of the built environment are associated with excessive and inadequate GWG.
KEY POINTS: · There are little data on the association between the built environment and pregnancy outcomes.. · Multiple aspects of the built environment are associated with excessive and inadequate GWG.. · These results suggest the role that neighborhood investment may play in improving pregnancy outcomes..