RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Using a motivator and deterrent questionnaire to predict actual donation return behavior among first-time African-origin blood donors
Swanevelder, R., Reddy, R., Chowdhury, D., Olmsted, M., Brambilla, D., Jentsch, U., Murphy, E. L., & REDS-III South Africa Investigators (2019). Using a motivator and deterrent questionnaire to predict actual donation return behavior among first-time African-origin blood donors. Transfusion, 59(9), 2885-2892. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15436
BACKGROUND: In South Africa, success in recruiting first-time African-origin blood donors at low risk for HIV infection has been tempered by lower-than-anticipated return rates. We studied whether self-reported motivators and deterrents could predict actual donor return among first-time donors.
METHODS: We administered a questionnaire on blood donation motivators and deterrents within 2 months after donation to a cohort of first-time African-origin blood donors in 2014 and followed their return behavior for 1 year. Survey responses associated with return within 1 year were assessed using separate multivariate logistic regression models for motivators and deterrents.
RESULTS: A total of 2902 first-time African origin donors with median age of 23 years and female predominance (59%) were included. Within 1 year 1574 (54% of donors) attempted at least one additional donation. Donors were more likely to return if they strongly agreed with the statement "Blood donation is an easy way to make a difference" (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.9) and "I donated in response to advertisements on the radio, TV or newspaper" (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1). English language preference and nonstudent employment status were also associated with donor return. Poor customer service (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.71), geographic region, and nonstudent employment status were associated with donor return in the deterrent model.
CONCLUSIONS: Prosocial motivators and marketing communications predicted return, while poor customer experience predicted nonreturn. This novel design allowed us to study the link between donation motivators and deterrents and actual return for donation in the African context.
