RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Using logarithmic derivative functions for assessing the risky weighting function for binary gambles
Chechile, R. A., & Barch, D. H. (2013). Using logarithmic derivative functions for assessing the risky weighting function for binary gambles. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57(1-2), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.001
A logarithmic derivative (LD) of a continuous function g (x) is itself a function in the form of g'(x)/g(x). Hazard and reverse hazard are examples of ID functions that have proven to be useful for discriminating among similar functions for stochastic systems, and the essential idea of ID functions can be used more generally. In this research, an analysis of the logarithmic derivative was employed to evaluate the various proposals for the risky weighting function omega(p) that have been advanced in the psychological and economic literature. Risky weighting functions are the weighting coefficients of the outcome utility values, i.e., if an outcome has an associated probability p, then g'(x)/g(x)(p) is the transform of p that weights the utility of the outcome. An experiment was done to obtain empirical estimates of the logarithmic derivative of the risky weighting function for individuals by utilizing a novel gamble-matching paradigm with binary gambles. Five models from the research literature did not predict the observed shape for the LD function. Four additional models for the risky weighting function could predict the general profile of the LD function but nonetheless resulted in a nonrandom, systematic pattern for the corresponding model fit residuals. The nonrandom pattern of the fit residuals is taken as evidence against the models. Consequently nine models had problems in accounting for the empirical LD function. However, two risky weighting functions provided an accurate description of the empirical LD function. These risky weighting functions are the Prelec function omega(p) = e(-s(-Inp)a), with a and s as fitting parameters, and a novel model, the Exponential Odds function omega(p) = e(-s(1-)b/pa) with a, b and s as fitting parameters. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.