RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Use of a continuous nephelometer to measure personal exposure to particles during the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Baltimore and Fresno panel studies
Howard-Reed, C., Rea, AW., Zufall, MJ., Burke, JM., Williams, RW., Suggs, JC., Sheldon, LS., Walsh, D., & Kwok, R. (2000). Use of a continuous nephelometer to measure personal exposure to particles during the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Baltimore and Fresno panel studies. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 50(7), 1125-1132. http://secure.awma.org/journal/Abstract.aspx?id=170
In population exposure studies, personal exposure to PM is typically measured as a 12- to 24-hr integrated mass concentration. To better understand short-term variation in personal PM exposure, continuous (1-min averaging time) nephelometers were worn by 15 participants as part of two U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lon-gitudinal PM exposure studies conducted in Baltimore County, MD, and Fresno, CA. Participants also wore iner-tial impactor samplers (24-hr integrated filter samples) and recorded their daily activities in 15-min intervals. In Bal-timore, the nephelometers correlated well (R 2 = 0.66) with the PM 2.5 impactors. Time-series plots of personal nephelometer data showed each participant's PM expo-sure to consist of a series of peaks of relatively short dura-tion. Activities corresponding to a significant instrument response included cooking, outdoor activities, transpor-tation, laundry, cleaning, shopping, gardening, moving between microenvironments, and removing/putting on the instrument. On average, 63-66% of the daily PM ex-posure occurred indoors at home (about 2/3 of which occurred during waking hours), primarily due to the large amount of time spent in that location (an average of 72- 77%). Although not a reference method for measuring mass concentration, the nephelometer did help identify PM sources and the relative contribution of those sources to an individual's personal exposure.