RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Study protocol and stakeholder perceptions of a randomized controlled trial of a co-response police-mental health team
Bailey, K., Hofer, M. S., Sightes, E., Lowder, E., Grommon, E., & Ray, B. (2023). Study protocol and stakeholder perceptions of a randomized controlled trial of a co-response police-mental health team. Journal of Experimental Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09598-2
ObjectivesDescribe the development, results, and stakeholder perceptions of randomization procedures for determining outcomes of a co-response police-mental health team.MethodsWe present randomization results using the CONSORT diagram and report on three semi-structured focus groups with eight co-response team members, including police officers, mental health clinicians, and program leaders.ResultsStudy procedures resulted in randomization of 686 co-response team-eligible calls for service to either receive a co-response team (treatment group, n = 376) or police-as-usual response (control group, n = 310). Focus groups revealed lessons for randomization of a co-response team, including the importance of the researcher-practitioner partnership, considerations for study site selection and staffing, and suggestions to proactively address ethical concerns of randomizing calls for service.ConclusionsRigorous evaluation of alternative policing programs is possible through randomization at the call-for-service level, provided researchers and program stakeholders work together to determine feasible procedures.
