RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Nyblade, L., Edmeades, J., & Pearson, E. (2010). Self-reported abortion-related morbidity: A comparison of measures in Madhya Pradesh, India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36(3), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1363/ipsrh.36.140.10
CONTEXT: Globally, abortion-related morbidity places a largely unmeasured physical, social and economic burden on women, yet little research has examined population-level morbidity, particularly in developing countries.
METHODS: Data were drawn from a representative 2002 survey in Madhya Pradesh, India, of married women aged 15-39 who had at least one child; the analysis examined 966 abortion attempts associated with 737 pregnancies. The prevalence and severity of self-reported morbidity were determined using a symptom-based measure and a bed rest-based measure. Comparative and concurrency analyses assessed how the measures captured and categorized morbidity, and how their results differed between rural and urban settings and by provider and method used.
RESULTS: Both measures found relatively high levels of abortion-related morbidity: The symptoms measure recorded morbidity in 58% and 46% of abortion attempts in rural and urban areas, respectively, and the bed-rest measure did so in 38% and 29% of attempts in these areas. With either measure, the proportion of attempts resulting in severe morbidity was higher for rural than for urban women. A substantial proportion of attempts were categorized as resulting in moderate or severe morbidity under the symptoms measure and in no morbidity under the bed-rest measure (16-20%), and a significant proportion were categorized as leading to severe morbidity under the first measure and to no or moderate morbidity under the second measure (6-17%). Differences also appeared in how the measures assessed morbidity according to the provider and method used.
CONCLUSIONS: Each measure captured a distinct dimension of abortion-related morbidity, which suggests that multiple measures should be used to more fully assess the burden of morbidity among women in developing countries.
