RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women
Bann, C. M., Parker, C. B., Grobman, W. A., Willinger, M., Simhan, H. N., Wing, D. A., Haas, D. M., Silver, R. M., Parry, S., Saade, G. R., Wapner, R. J., Elovitz, M. A., Miller, E. S., Reddy, U. M., & NuMoM2b Study (2017). Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 38(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1252910
Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of three measures, the perceived stress scale (PSS), pregnancy experience scale (PES), and state trait anxiety inventory (STAI), for assessing stress and anxiety during pregnancy among a large sample of nulliparous women.Methods: The sample included 10,002 pregnant women participating in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nMoM2b). Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and factorial validity with confirmatory factor analyses. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated to determine stability of PSS scales over time. Psychometric properties were examined for the overall sample, as well as subgroups based on maternal age, race/ethnicity and language.Results: All three scales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the factor structures of the PSS and the PES. However, a one-factor solution of the trait-anxiety subscale from the STAI did not fit well; a two-factor solution, splitting the items into factors based on direction of item wording (positive versus negative) provided a better fit. Scores on the PSS were generally stable over time (ICC=0.60). Subgroup analyses revealed a few items that did not perform well on Spanish versions of the scales.Conclusion: Overall, the scales performed well, suggesting they could be useful tools for identifying women experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety during pregnancy and allowing for the implementation of interventions to help reduce maternal stress and anxiety.
