RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Prison system versus critics' views on the use of restrictive housing
Objective risk classification or ascriptive assignment?
Labrecque, RM., & Mears, DP. (2019). Prison system versus critics' views on the use of restrictive housing: Objective risk classification or ascriptive assignment?Prison Journal, 99(2), 194-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519825492
Despite the widespread use of restrictive housing in correctional institutions, little is known about the factors associated with placement in this setting. This study advances two theoretical arguments about the use of this practice. The prison system view argues this housing is essential for institutional order and that, accordingly, only inmates who pose an objective risk to safety get placed in such housing. By contrast, the critics' view argues this housing causes adverse effects and disproportionately targets certain inmates based on their ascriptive characteristics, such as their mental health status or race. The results indicate support for both perspectives.