RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Schnefke, C. H., Thakwalakwa, C., Muth, M. K., Phuka, J., Coates, J., Rogers, B., Colaiezzi, B., Bell, W., & Flax, V. L. (2019). Optimizing portion-size estimation aids: A formative evaluation in Malawi. Public Health Nutrition, 22(17), 3127-3139. Article PII S1368980019001733. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019001733
Objective: To investigate preferences for and ease-of-use perceptions of different aspects of printed and digitally displayed photographic portion-size estimation aids (PSEA) in a low-resource setting and to document accuracy of portion-size selections using PSEA with different visual characteristics. Design: A convergent mixed-methods design and stepwise approach were used to assess characteristics of interest in isolation. Participants served themselves food and water, which were weighed before and after consumption to measure leftovers and quantity consumed. Thirty minutes later, data collectors administered a meal recall using a PSEA and then a semi-structured interview. Setting: Blantyre and Chikwawa Districts in the southern region of Malawi. Participants: Ninety-six women, aged 18-45 years. Results: Preferences and ease-of-use perceptions favoured photographs rather than drawings of shapes, three and five portion-size options rather than three with four virtual portion-size options, a 45 degrees rather than a 90 degrees photograph angle, and simultaneous rather than sequential presentation of portion-size options. Approximately half to three-quarters of participants found the portion-size options represented appropriate amounts of foods or water consumed. Photographs with three portion sizes resulted in more accurate portion-size selections (closest to measured consumption) than other format and number of portion-size option combinations. A 45 degrees angle and simultaneous presentation were more accurate than a 90 degrees angle and sequential presentation of images. Conclusions: Results from testing PSEA visual characteristics separately can be used to generate optimal PSEA, which can improve participants' experiences during meal recalls.