RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Measuring educational inequality in South Africa and Perú
Crouch, L., Gustafsson, M., & Lavado, P. (2009). Measuring educational inequality in South Africa and Perú. In DB. Holsinger, & WJ. Jacob (Eds.), Inequality in Education: Comparative and International Perspectives (pp. 461-484). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2652-1_20
In 2000, Thomas, Wang, and Fan published a paper calling for the application of the Gini coefficient to educational attainment. The idea was to treat educational attainment as a wealth stock, and to calculate Gini coefficients for, say, years of attainment, as a way to see trends within countries or to compare countries. Since then there have been a few applications to particular countries. Holsinger, Collins, and Rew (2004) apply a similar methodology to measure regional variations in attainment in Vietnam. In his presidential speech to the Comparative and International Education Society, Holsinger (2005) calls for further analysis of education inequality.
Here we take up this challenge, with several twists and extensions. First, we compare two interesting societies: South Africa and Perú. Second, we extend the concept not just to attainment but to input provision and achievement. Third, our analysis is not about the inequality of education spending or attainment per se, but of its concentration along income lines.