RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Malaria infection prevalence and sensitivity of reactive case detection in zanzibar
Stuck, L., Fakih, B. S., Al-Mafazy, A.-W. H., Hofmann, N. E., Holzschuh, A., Grossenbacher, B., Bennett, A., Cotter, C., Reaves, E., Ali, A., der Horst, T. V., Felger, I., Hetzel, M. W., & Yukich, J. (2020). Malaria infection prevalence and sensitivity of reactive case detection in zanzibar. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 97, 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.017
Background: Reactive case detection (RCD) is a commonly used strategy for malaria surveillance and response in elimination settings. Many approaches to RCD assume detectable infections are clustered within and around homes of passively detected cases (index households), which has been evaluated in a number of settings with disparate results.Methods: Household questionnaires and diagnostic testing were conducted following RCD investigations in Zanzibar, Tanzania, including the index household and up to 9 additional neighboring households.Results: Of 12,487 participants tested by malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT), 3.2% of those residing in index households and 0.4% of those residing in non-index households tested positive (OR = 8.4; 95%CI: 5.7, 12.5). Of 6,281 participants tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), 8.4% of those residing in index households and 1.3% of those residing in non-index households tested positive (OR = 7.1; 95%CI: 6.1, 10.9). Within households of index cases defined as imported, odds of qPCR-positivity amongst members reporting recent travel were 1.4 times higher than among those without travel history (95%CI: 0.2, 4.4). Amongst non-index households, odds of qPCR-detectable infection were no different between households located within 50 m of the index household as compared with those located farther away (OR = 0.8, 95%CI: 0.5, 1.4). Sensitivity of RDT to detect qPCR-detectable infections was 34% (95%CI: 26.4, 42.3).Conclusions: Malaria prevalence in index households in Zanzibar is much higher than in non-index households, in which prevalence is very low. Travelers represent a high-risk population. Low sensitivity of RDTs due to a high prevalence of low-density infections results in an RCD system missing a large proportion of the parasite reservoir. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).