RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Major ionic compositions of fine particulate matter in an animal feeding operation facility and its vicinity
Li, QF., Wang-Li, LJ., Liu, ZF., Jayanty, R., Shah, SB., & Bloomfield, P. (2014). Major ionic compositions of fine particulate matter in an animal feeding operation facility and its vicinity. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 64(11), 1279-1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.942442
Animal feeding operations (AFOs) produce particulate matter (PM) and gaseous pollutants. Investigation of the chemical composition of PM2.5 inside and in the local vicinity of AFOs can help to understand the impact of the AFO emissions on ambient secondary PM formation. This study was conducted on a commercial egg production farm in North Carolina. Samples of PM2.5 were collected from five stations, with one located in an egg production house and the other four located in the vicinity of the farm along four wind directions. The major ions of NH4+, Na+, K+, SO42-, Cl-, and NO3- were analyzed using ion chromatography (IC). In the house, the mostly abundant ions were SO42-, Cl-, and K+. At ambient stations, SO42-, and NH4+ were the two most abundant ions. In the house, NH4+, SO42-, and NO3- accounted for only 10% of the PM2.5 mass; at ambient locations, NH4+, SO42-, and NO3- accounted for 36-41% of the PM2.5 mass. In the house, NH4+ had small seasonal variations indicating that gas-phase NH3 was not the only major force driving its gas-particle partitioning. At the ambient stations, NH4+ had the highest concentrations in summer. In the house, K+, Na+, and Cl- were highly correlated with each other. In ambient locations, SO42- and NH4+ had a strong correlation, whereas in the house, SO42- and NH4+ had a very weak correlation. Ambient temperature and solar radiation were positively correlated with NH4+ and SO42-. This study suggests that secondary PM formation inside the animal house was not an important source of PM2.5. In the vicinity, NH3 emissions had greater impact on PM2.5 formation. [GRAPHICS]