RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Integrating the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) into a culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) approach to conduct mixed-method evaluations of diabetes prevention and management programs reaching underresourced populations and communities
Jacobs, S. R., Glasgow, L., Amico, P., Farris, K. D., Rutledge, G., & Smith, B. D. (2024). Integrating the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) into a culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) approach to conduct mixed-method evaluations of diabetes prevention and management programs reaching underresourced populations and communities. Prevention Science, 25(SUPPL 1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01509-1
Diabetes is a significant population health threat. Evidence-based interventions, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Diabetes Prevention Program and diabetes self-management education and support programs, can help prevent, delay, or manage the disease. However, participation is suboptimal, especially among populations who are at an increased risk of developing diabetes. Evaluations of programs reaching populations who are medically underserved or people with lower incomes can help elucidate how best to tailor evidence-based interventions, but it is also important for evaluations to account for cultural and contextual factors. Culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) is a framework for centering an evaluation in the culture of the programs being evaluated. We integrated CRE with implementation and outcome constructs from the Adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to ensure that the evaluation produced useful evidence for putting evidence-based diabetes interventions to use in real-world settings, reaching populations who are at an increased risk of developing diabetes. The paper provides an overview of how we integrated CRE and CFIR approaches to conduct mixed-methods evaluations of evidence-based diabetes interventions.