RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Improving adaptation to wildfire smoke and extreme heat in frontline communities
Evidence from a community-engaged pilot study in the San Francisco Bay Area
Herbert, N., Beckman, C., Cannedy, C., Cao, J., Cho, S.-H., Fischer, S., Huang, S., Kramer, S. J., Lopez, O., Lopez, S. S., Ouyang, D., Suckale, J., Wulf-Saena, V., Zhang, Z., & Wong-Parodi, G. (2023). Improving adaptation to wildfire smoke and extreme heat in frontline communities: Evidence from a community-engaged pilot study in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environmental Research Letters, 18(7), Article 074026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acddf9
Exposure to climate hazards is increasing, and the experiences of frontline communities warrant meaningful and urgent attention towards how to mitigate, manage, and adapt to hazards. We report results from a community-engaged pilot (November 2021-June 2022) of N = 30 participants in four frontline communities of the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. The study region is an area where low-income, non-English-speaking residents are inequitably exposed and vulnerable to wildfire smoke, extreme heat, and other climate hazards. Building from a yearslong partnership of researchers, community organizations, and community members, we report the feasibility of a project piloting (1) instruments to monitor indoor air quality, temperature, and participant sleep health, and (2) interventions to improve indoor air quality and support protective behaviors. Data collection included experience-based survey data (via in-person administered surveys and a smartphone application) and interviews about heat and air quality, as well as data from an air monitoring protocol. Results cover the prevalence of hazard exposure and protective actions among participants. We discuss throughout methods for conducting and evaluating a community-engaged pilot, particularly by using a community ambassador program. Implications include the feasibility of community-engaged research projects, including discussion of resources required to accomplish this work.