RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Should graphs of risk or rate ratios be plotted on a log scale?
Rothman, K., Wise, LA., & Hatch, EE. (2011). Should graphs of risk or rate ratios be plotted on a log scale?American Journal of Epidemiology, 174(3), 376-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr156
Should graphs of risk or rate ratios be plotted on a logarithmic scale? The conventional answer to this question seems to be yes ( 1), even to the extent that some have called on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors to ban graphs of ratio measures that do not employ a log scale ( 2). The policy of the American Journal of Epidemiology nearly achieves this ban; the Instructions to Authors state, “When plotting relative measures of effect (e.g., relative risks, relative odds), a logarithmic scale must be used unless there is a compelling reason to use an arithmetic scale” ( http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/ …