RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions
an EPC update
Berkman, N. D., Lohr, K. N., Ansari, M. T., Balk, E. M., Kane, R., McDonagh, M., Morton, S. C., Viswanathan, M., Bass, E. B., Butler, M., Gartlehner, G., Hartling, L., McPheeters, M., Morgan, L. C., Reston, J., Sista, P., Whitlock, E., & Chang, S. (2015). Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(11), 1312-1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.023
Objectives: To revise 2010 guidance on grading the strength of evidence (SOB) of the effectiveness of drugs, devices, and other preventive and therapeutic interventions in systematic reviews produced by the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program, established by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Study Design and Setting: A cross-EPC working group reviewed authoritative systems for grading SOE [primarily the approach from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group] and conducted extensive discussions with GRADE and other experts.
Results: Updated guidance continues to be conceptually similar to GRADE. Reviewers are to evaluate SOE separately for each major treatment comparison for each major outcome. We added reporting bias as a required domain and retained study limitations (risk of bias), consistency, directness, and precision (and three optional domains). Additional guidance covers scoring consistency, precision, and reporting bias, grading bodies of evidence with randomized controlled trials and observational studies, evaluating single study bodies of evidence, using studies with high risk of bias, and presenting findings with greater clarity and transparency. SOB is graded high, moderate, low, or insufficient, reflecting reviewers' confidence in the findings for a specific treatment comparison and outcome.
Conclusion: No single approach for grading SOE suits all reviews, but a more consistent and transparent approach to reporting summary information will make reviews more useful to the broad range of audiences that AHRQ's work aims to reach. EPC working groups will consider ongoing challenges and modify guidance as needed, on issues such as combining trials and observational studies in bodies of evidence, weighting domains, and combining qualitative and quantitative syntheses. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
