RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Effect of injection laryngoplasty material on outcomes in pediatric vocal fold paralysis
Bishop, R., Mousset, M., Althubaiti, A., Gerwig, A., Kern, C., Onwuka, A., Sethia, R., Chiang, T., & Elmaraghy, C. (2022). Effect of injection laryngoplasty material on outcomes in pediatric vocal fold paralysis. Translational Pediatrics, 11(7), 1114-1121. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-21-361
Background: While injection laryngoplasty is becoming increasingly common in children, there has not been clearly established guidelines for the choice of injection material. This study evaluates for variability in post-surgical outcomes between different materials used for injection laryngoplasty in the treatment of pediatric unilateral vocal cord paralysis.Methods: In this cohort study, a retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing injection laryngoplasty for unilateral vocal cord paralysis at our tertiary-care children's hospital between January 2010 and December 2019. Patients with vocal cord paresis or bilateral vocal cord paralysis were excluded from this study. Demographics, pre- and post- injection clinic visits, and operative reports were reviewed to compare outcomes between injection materials, including the number of injections required, inter-surgical interval, and rate of vocal improvement.Results: Forty-four patients were included in the analysis. Half of the patients were female, and half were male. A total of 97 injections were observed, with 32 patients receiving multiple injections. The mean age at first injection was 7 years. The most common causes of vocal fold paralysis were iatrogenic (n=21, 48%) and idiopathic (n=9, 20%). Thirty-nine percent (n=17) had a history of cardiac surgery. Forty-five percent of injections used Radiesse (R) voice/Prolaryn (R) plus, 35% used Radiesse (R)/Prolaryn (R) voice Gel, and 20% used CymetraT. The material used was not associated with a difference in post-operative outcomes, including number of injections, (P=0.10; 0.29), inter-surgical interval (P=0.27; 0.29), or rate of voice improvement (P=0.86; 0.36).Conclusions: Neither material choice nor demographic factors were associated with a difference in outcomes following injection laryngoplasty or a change in the inter-surgical interval. Further research is needed to develop standardized protocols for injection laryngoplasty in this population.