RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
An economic evaluation of a police–mental health co-response program: data from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Hofer, M. S., Lu, T. T., Bailey, K., Aldridge, A. P., Grommon, E., Lowder, E., & Ray, B. (2024). An economic evaluation of a police–mental health co-response program: data from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09635-8
Background Alternative responses to behavioral health emergencies are increasingly common interventions to address the overrepresentation of people with mental illness in the criminal legal and health systems. We compared costs associated with receiving a crisis response from police-as-usual versus a police-mental health co-response team that occurred as part of a randomized controlled trial.
Methods Eligible 911 calls-for-service were randomized to receive a police-as-usual or a co-response. Next, we record-linked randomized events to emergency medical services, jail, outpatient services, and emergency department data to assess outcomes. We calculated per-person costs of service utilization following the randomized event from a public-sector perspective.
Results Our analysis revealed no cost-savings from the co-response. Persons who received a co-response team response had greater 12-month post-randomized incident costs associated with outpatient behavioral health encounters and emergency department visits.
Conclusions Rigorous evaluations and cost analyses are important for determining whether alternative police response interventions achieve community goals.
