RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
The cost-effectiveness of screening for pre-diabetes among overweight and obese U.S. adults
Hoerger, T., Hicks, K., Sorensen, SW., Herman, WH., Ratner, RE., Ackermann, RT., Zhang, P., & Engelgau, MM. (2007). The cost-effectiveness of screening for pre-diabetes among overweight and obese U.S. adults. Diabetes Care, 30(11), 2874-2879. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-0885
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of screening overweight and obese persons for prediabetes and then modifying their lifestyle based on the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Research Design and METHODS: A Markov simulation model was used to estimate disease progression, costs, and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a health care system perspective. We considered 2 screening/treatment strategies for prediabetes. Strategy 1 included screening overweight persons and giving them the lifestyle intervention included in the DPP if they were diagnosed with both impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Strategy 2 included screening followed by lifestyle intervention for persons diagnosed with either IGT or IFG or both. Each strategy was compared with a program of no screening. RESULTS: Screening for prediabetes and treating those identified as having both IGT and IFG with the DPP lifestyle intervention had a cost-effectiveness ratio of $8,181 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) relative to no screening. If treatment was also provided to persons with only IGT or only IFG (Strategy 2), the cost-effectiveness ratio increased to $9,511 per QALY. Changes in screening-related parameters had small effects on the cost-effectiveness ratios; the results were more sensitive to changes in intervention-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for prediabetes in the overweight and obese U.S. population followed by the DPP lifestyle intervention has a relatively attractive cost-effectiveness ratio.