RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Content evaluation of pruritus, skin pain and sleep disturbance patient-reported outcome measures for adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis
Qualitative interviews
Blauvelt, A., Reckleff, J., Zhao, Y., Clark, M., Kosa, K., Harris, N., Esfandiari, E., Martin, S., Whalley, D., & Emma, G.-Y. (2024). Content evaluation of pruritus, skin pain and sleep disturbance patient-reported outcome measures for adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Qualitative interviews. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae346
Background Pruritus, skin pain and sleep disturbance place a significant burden on individuals with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and negatively affect their quality of life. Fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess AD-related pruritus, skin pain and sleep disturbance are important for evaluating the effectiveness of new AD treatments.Objectives To evaluate the content validity of five AD-related PROMs in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD [the Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the AD Skin Pain NRS, the Sleep Disturbance NRS, the skin pain-specific Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and the skin pain-specific Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)], and to assess patient-reported experience with pruritus, skin pain and sleep disturbance.Methods A qualitative study in adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and adults (aged >= 18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD was conducted in two consecutive stages. In each stage, two iterative rounds of individual interviews were conducted by experienced interviewers. All interviews included concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing components. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.Results Twenty-seven adults and 20 adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD took part in the initial content evaluation (stage 1) of the Worst Pruritus NRS (1.0) and AD Skin Pain NRS (1.0) (n = 26; 16 adults, 10 adolescents) and in the subsequent content evaluation (stage 2) of the revised Worst Pruritus NRS (1.1), revised AD Skin Pain NRS (1.1), Sleep Disturbance NRS, skin pain-specific PGIC and skin pain-specific PGIS (n = 21; 11 adults, 10 adolescents). The results were generally aligned and consistent for adult and adolescent participants. Additionally, we found that sleep disturbance is relevant and important for evaluation in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD (stage 2), while also providing further confirmation of this for pruritus and skin pain (stages 1 and 2).Conclusions Our findings support the content validity of the revised Worst Pruritus NRS (1.1), revised AD Skin Pain NRS (1.1), Sleep Disturbance NRS, skin pain-specific PGIC and skin pain-specific PGIS in individuals aged >= 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Furthermore, the findings support sleep disturbance, skin pain and pruritus as being relevant and important for adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD.Pruritus, skin pain and sleep disturbance have a negative impact on individuals with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess AD-related pruritus, skin pain and sleep disturbance are important to evaluate the effectiveness of new AD treatments. We assessed the content validity of five AD-related PROMs in interviews in people with moderate-to-severe AD. Our findings support the content validity of the five PROMs assessed in individuals aged >= 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD. We also confirm that sleep disturbance, skin pain and pruritus are relevant and important in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD.