RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
A comparison of biocontaminant levels associated with hard vs. carpet floors in non-problem schools
results of a year long study (1D5o4)
Foarde, K., & Berry, M. (2002). A comparison of biocontaminant levels associated with hard vs. carpet floors in non-problem schools: results of a year long study (1D5o4). In H. Levin, & G. Cordell (Eds.), Indoor Air 2002: proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, held in Monterey, California, June 30-July 5, 2002 (pp. 980-985). International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate ( ISIAQ ).
Choosing the appropriate floor surface for a school environment is a complex issue. To assist school personnel in determining which flooring is best for their school, we studied the biocontaminant levels associated with carpeted and hard surface flooring. Two schools, as similar as possible with the exception of their floor coverings, one predominantly tiled and one predominantly carpeted, were selected. Neither school was a ‘problem’ building. Multiple biocontaminants were measured. For flooring, there were statistically significant differences for all the tested contaminants except fungi. The carpeted surfaces, being strong sinks, contained higher levels of the contaminants except for fungi. However, airborne allergen levels were significantly higher over hard floors than over carpeted floors. Significant differences were found for spores, fungi, and dust mass. The results suggest that carpet floor covering was not the major contributor to airborne levels of biocontaminants in these two nonproblem schools.