RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Comparative pharmacokinetics and local tolerance of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) from subcutaneous implant in rabbits, dogs, and macaques
Gatto, G. J., Krovi, A., Li, L., Massud, I., Holder, A., Gary, J., Mills, P., Mitchell, J., Luecke, E., Demkovich, Z. R., Heneine, W., García-Lerma, J. G., Marzinke, M. A., Brand, R. M., Dobard, C. W., Johnson, L. M., & Van Der Straten, A. (2022). Comparative pharmacokinetics and local tolerance of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) from subcutaneous implant in rabbits, dogs, and macaques. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13, Article 923954. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.923954
The administration of antiretrovirals (ARVs) for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly efficacious and may benefit from new long-acting (LA) drug delivery approaches. This paper describes a subcutaneous, reservoir-style implant for the LA delivery of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and documents the preclinical assessment of implant safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) in New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits (3 groups of n = 5), beagle dogs (2 groups of n = 6), and rhesus macaques (2 groups of n = 3). Placebo implants were placed in rabbits (n = 10) and dogs (n = 12). Implant parameters, including selection of the TAF form, choice of excipient, and PCL formulation were tuned to achieve targeted concentrations of the active anabolite of TAF, tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP), within peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and mucosal tissues relevant to HIV transmission. Sustained concentrations of TFV-DP in PBMCs over 100 fmol/106 cells were achieved in all animal species indicating that the implants effectively delivered TAF for 3-6 months. Unlike placebo implants without TAF, all active implants resulted in local adverse events (AEs) proximal to the implant ranging in severity from mild to moderate and included dermal inflammation and necrosis across all species. Despite these AEs, the implant performed as designed and achieved a constant drug release profile, supporting the continued development of this drug delivery platform.