RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Cohort Profile: The international epidemiological databases to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) in sub-Saharan Africa
Egger, M., Ekouevi, DK., Williams, C., Lyamuya, RE., Mukumbi, H., Braitstein, P., Hartwell, T., Graber, C., Chi, BH., Boulle, A., Dabis, F., & Wools-Kaloustian, K. (2012). Cohort Profile: The international epidemiological databases to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(5), 1256-1264. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr080
The HIV/AIDS pandemic is a public health emergency in many low and middle-income countries. Out of the estimated 33.3 million people with HIV at the end of 2009, 22.5 million were in sub-Saharan Africa and the majority of these were women.1 The introduction in 1996 of combination anti-retroviral therapy (ART) led to a substantial reduction in morbidity and mortality in high-income countries.2,3 In more recent years, efforts by governmental programmes such as the President’s Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and The Global Fund as well as non-governmental programmes have resulted in the scale-up of ART in resource-limited settings: at the end of 2009, 5.25 million people were reported to be receiving ART therapy in low- and middle-income countries.1
Although still far from achieving universal coverage,1 the massive concerted scale-up of ART is unprecedented in global health. The long-term outcomes of ART in Africa and other regions are, however, not well defined. Poor retention in care, limited access to second-line ART regimens, co-infections and comorbidities of HIV infection, for example tuberculosis and cancer, and the emergence of drug resistance and toxicities are important challenges to long-term programme effectiveness in resource-limited settings.7 The World Health Organization (WHO) advocates a public health approach to ART in resource-limited settings, to maximize benefit in a setting of low levels of training for health-care workers, high patient burden and limited availability of drugs. Key characteristics include the standardization of first-line and second-line ART regimens, simplified clinical decision-making and standardized clinical and laboratory monitoring.4–6