RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Clinical characteristics and functioning of adults with bipolar I disorder
Evidence from the Mental and Substance Use Disorders Prevalence Study
Bareis, N., Olfson, M., Dixon, L., Chwastiak, L. A., Monroe-DeVita, M., Kessler, R. C., Gibbons, R., Edlund, M. J., Guyer, H., Kreski, N., Graupensperger, S., Winans, K., & Stroup, T. S. (2024). Clinical characteristics and functioning of adults with bipolar I disorder: Evidence from the Mental and Substance Use Disorders Prevalence Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 366, 317-325. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.133
Background: Knowledge of clinical, treatment and life circumstances of individuals with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) in US households is informed by decades old epidemiological surveys. Methods: The Mental and Substance Use Disorders Prevalence Study was conducted October 2020-October 2022. Clinicians administered the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 diagnosing 12-month prevalence of BP-I and other mental health disorders (MHD) among 4,764 adults aged 18-65 years and collected sociodemographic information. We examined clinical characteristics, differences by sex and age among adults with BP-I, and compared adults with BP-I versus no MHD regarding sociodemographic characteristics, functioning, and substance use disorders (SUDs). Results: Prevalence of BP-I in the MDPS was 1.5%. Among those with BP-I, 73.4% had comorbid psychiatric disorders, and 43.4% had comorbid SUDs. Alcohol use disorder was higher in those with BP-I versus no MHD (33.0% vs. 6.3%). Mean Global Assessment of Functioning scores were lower among those with BP-I versus no MHD (53.2 vs. 77.0). Of individuals with BP-I, 64.9% had past-year outpatient, 5.4% inpatient, and 18.7% minimally adequate treatment (≥1 antimanic agent and ≥4 outpatient visits). Individuals with BP-I were less likely to be employed (37.3% vs. 63.0%) and have a family income ≥$20,000 (48.2% vs. 81.9%) versus no MDPS MHD. Limitations: The survey response rate was low. Conclusions: In this sample, many individuals with BP-I had psychiatric and SUD comorbidities, lived in poverty and had functional impairment. Few received adequate treatment; women and younger individuals were particularly disadvantaged. Early detection and treatment represent substantial opportunities to improve outcomes.