RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Beyond the syndemic condom negotiation and use among women experiencing partner violence
Peasant, C. J., Sullivan, T. P., Weiss, N. H., Martinez, I., & Meyer, J. P. (2017). Beyond the syndemic condom negotiation and use among women experiencing partner violence. AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 29(4), 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1224296
HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) disproportionately affect women who experience intimate partner violence (IPV).
OBJECTIVE:
The current study (1) applied a syndemic framework to study the collective effects of problematic drug use, hazardous drinking, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on fear of condom negotiation, condom negotiation, and condom use and (2) evaluated condom negotiation (controlling for fear of condom negotiation) as a mediator of the association between syndemic severity and condom use among low-income IPV-exposed women.
METHODS:
Participants were 158 women living in the community and experiencing ongoing IPV who completed face-to-face, computer-assisted interviews.
RESULTS:
Almost three-fourths of the participants reported problematic drug use, hazardous drinking, depression, and/or PTSD; many of these factors were correlated, indicating a syndemic. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses revealed associations between syndemic severity and fear of condom negotiation (OR = 1.57, p = .02), condom negotiation (β = -8.51, p = .001), and condom use (β = -8.26, p = .01). Meditation analyses identified condom negotiation as a mediator of the association between syndemic severity and condom use (effect = -6.57, SE = 2.01, [95% CI: -10.66, -2.77]).
CONCLUSIONS:
Results fill a critical gap in previous research by identifying condom negotiation as a mechanism through which this syndemic affects condom use. Prevention and intervention programs should consider addressing condom negotiation to reduce sexual risk among this high-risk population. Further, because IPV-exposed women may experience fear related to condom negotiation, it is critical that prevention and intervention efforts for this population offer skills to safely negotiate condom use, increase condom use, and reduce STI and HIV risk.
