RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Barriers to opioid use disorder treatment among people who use drugs in the rural United States
A qualitative, multi-site study
Stopka, T. J., Estadt, A. T., Leichtling, G., Schleicher, J. C., Mixson, L. S., Bresett, J., Romo, E., Dowd, P., Walters, S. M., Young, A. M., Zule, W., Friedmann, P. D., Go, V. F., Baker, R., & Fredericksen, R. J. (2024). Barriers to opioid use disorder treatment among people who use drugs in the rural United States: A qualitative, multi-site study. Social Science & Medicine, 346, Article 116660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116660
Background: In 2020, 2.8 million people required substance use disorder (SUD) treatment in nonmetropolitan or 'rural' areas in the U.S. Among this population, only 10% received SUD treatment from a specialty facility, and 1 in 500 received medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We explored the context surrounding barriers to SUD treatment in the rural United States. Methods: We conducted semi -structured, in-depth interviews from 2018 to 2019 to assess barriers to SUD treatment among people who use drugs (PWUD) across seven rural U.S. study sites. Using the social -ecological model (SEM), we examined individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy factors contributing to perceived barriers to SUD treatment. We employed deductive and inductive coding and analytical approaches to identify themes. We also calculated descriptive statistics for participant characteristics and salient themes. Results: Among 304 participants (55% male, mean age 36 years), we identified barriers to SUD treatment in rural areas across SEM levels. At the individual/interpersonal level, relevant themes included: fear of withdrawal, the need to "get things in order" before entering treatment, close-knit communities and limited confidentiality, networks and settings that perpetuated drug use, and stigma. Organizational -level barriers included: strict facility rules, treatment programs managed like corrections facilities, lack of gender -specific treatment programs, and concerns about jeopardizing employment. Community -level barriers included: limited availability of treatment in local rural communities, long distances and limited transportation, waitlists, and a lack of information about treatment options. Policy -level themes included insurance challenges and system -imposed barriers such as arrest and incarceration. Conclusion: Our findings highlight multi -level barriers to SUD treatment in rural U.S. communities. Salient barriers included the need to travel long distances to treatment, challenges to confidentiality due to small, closeknit communities where people are highly familiar with one another, and high -threshold treatment program practices. Our findings point to the need to facilitate the elimination of treatment barriers at each level of the SEM in rural America.