RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Ankle accelerometry for assessing physical activity among adolescent girls
Threshold determination, validity, reliability, and feasibility
Hager, E. R., Treuth, M. S., Gormely, C., Epps, L., Snitker, S., & Black, M. M. (2015). Ankle accelerometry for assessing physical activity among adolescent girls: Threshold determination, validity, reliability, and feasibility. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 86(4), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.1063574
Ankle accelerometry allows for 24-hr data collection and improves data volume/ integrity versus hip accelerometry. Using Actical ankle accelerometry, the purpose of this study was to (a) develop sensitive/specific thresholds, (b) examine validity/reliability, (c) compare new thresholds with those of the manufacturer, and (d) examine feasibility in a community sample (low-income, urban adolescent girls). Method: Two studies were conducted with 6th- through 7th-grade girls (aged 10-14 years old): First was a laboratory study (n=24), in which 2 Actical accelerometers were placed on the ankle and worn while measuring energy expenditure (Cosmed K4b2, metabolic equivalents [METs]) during 10 prescribed activities. Analyses included device equivalence reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], activity counts of 2 Acticals), criterion-related validity (correlation, activity counts and METs), and calculations of sensitivity, specificity, kappa, and receiver-operating characteristic curves for thresholds. The second was a free-living study (n=459), in which an Actical was worn for more than 7 days on the ankle (full 24-hr days retained). Analyses included feasibility (frequencies, missing data) and paired t tests (new thresholds vs. those of the manufacturer). Results: In the laboratory study, the Actical demonstrated reliability (ICC=.92) and validity (r=.81). Thresholds demonstrated sensitivity (91%), specificity (84%), kappa=.73 (p=.043), area under curve range=.81-.97. In the free-living study, 99.6% of participants wore the accelerometer; 84.1% had complete/valid data (mean=5.7- days). Primary reasons for missing/invalid data included: improper programming/ documentation (5.2%), failure to return device (5.0%), and wear-time # 2 days (2.8%). The moderate-to-vigorous physical activity threshold (. 3,200 counts/minute) yielded 37.2 min/day, 2 to 4.5 times lower than that of the manufacturer's software (effect size=0.74-4.05). Conclusions: Validity, reliability, and feasibility evidences support Actical ankle accelerometry to assess physical activity in community studies of adolescent girls. When comparing manufacturers' software versus new thresholds, a major difference was observed.