RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Adolescent’s explicit and implicit cigarette cognitions predict experimentation with both cigarettes and e-cigarettes
Cappelli, C., Pike, J., Xie, B., Michaels, J., & Stacy, A. (2024). Adolescent’s explicit and implicit cigarette cognitions predict experimentation with both cigarettes and e-cigarettes. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 50(3), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2024.2335979
Background: Past year, month, and lifetime adolescent e-cigarette use rates remain persistently high, despite falling cigarette use rates. Previous investigations have noted a strong relationship between an individual’s positive and negative cognitions related to a behavior, and subsequent initiation of that behavior.
Objective: This investigation was conducted to determine the impact positive and negative explicit and implicit cigarette-related cognitions may have on the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among at-risk, cigarette-naive adolescents.
Methods: A three-year longitudinal investigation evaluated the relationship between cigarette-related cognitions and subsequent cigarette and e-cigarette use among 586 alternative high school students (female: 50.8%; mean age: 17.4 years; Hispanic/Latino: 75.0%) who had never smoked cigarettes at the baseline assessment. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to generate demographics-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Results: Students with higher positive explicit cigarette cognitions at the baseline had greater odds of subsequent cigarette use (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.11–2.68). If students also reported an increase over time in positive (OR = 3.45, 95% CI 2.10–5.68) or negative (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.03–3.61) explicit cigarette cognitions, the odds of cigarette use increased. The odds of dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes were greater among students who had higher negative implicit cigarette cognitions at the baseline (OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.03–4.17) compared to those with lower levels of negative implicit cognitions.
Conclusion: Prevention programming that focuses on decreasing positive cognitions related to nicotine and tobacco use may have greater overall effect on decreasing use compared to programs that only focus on increasing negative cognitions individuals form surrounding cigarette or e-cigarettes.