RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Estimating air pollution spatial variation using street-level imagery
Suel, E., Sorek-Hamer, M., Moise, I., von Pohle, M., Sahasrabhojanee, A., Asanjan, A. A., Arku, R. E., Alli, A. S., Barratt, B., Clark, S. N., Middel, A., Deardorff, E., Lingenfelter, V., Oza, N. C., Yadav, N., Ezzati, M., & Brauer, M. (2022). What you see is what you breathe? Estimating air pollution spatial variation using street-level imagery. Remote Sensing, 14(14), Article 3429. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143429
High spatial resolution information on urban air pollution levels is unavailable in many areas globally, partially due to the high input data needs of existing estimation approaches. We introduced a computer vision method to estimate annual means for air pollution levels from street-level images. We used annual mean estimates of NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations from locally calibrated models as labels from London, New York, and Vancouver to allow for compilation of a sufficiently large dataset (similar to 250 k images for each city). Our experimental setup is designed to quantify intra- and intercity transferability of image-based model estimates. Performances were high and comparable to traditional land-use regression (LUR) and dispersion models when training and testing images from the same city (R-2 values between 0.51 and 0.95 when validated on data from ground monitoring stations). Similar to LUR models, transferability of models between cities in different geographies is more difficult. Specifically, transferability between the three cities (London, New York, and Vancouver), which have similar pollution source profiles, was moderately successful (R-2 values between zero and 0.67). Comparatively, performances when transferring models trained on cities with very different source profiles, such as Accra in Ghana and Hong Kong, were lower (R-2 between zero and 0.21). This suggests a need for local calibration, using additional measurement data from cities that share similar source profiles.