RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Remote-use applications of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised clinical outcome assessment tool
A scoping review
Bhushan, N., DeMuro, C., Gras-Najjar, J., Reno, J. E., Rockwood, N. J., Quattrone, W., Adams, E. T., Kelly, B. J., McLeod, L. D., Bhavnani, S., Bocell , F., Campbell, M., Kontson , K., Reasner , D., Zhang, C., & Retzky, S. (2024). Remote-use applications of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised clinical outcome assessment tool: A scoping review. Value in Health, 27(10), 1454-1465. Article S1098301524023659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.005
Objectives: In 2021, the US Congress passed the Accelerating Access to Critical Therapies for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Act. The law encourages development of "tools, methods, and processes" to improve clinical trial efficiency for neurodegenerative diseases. The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is an outcome measure administered during in-person clinic visits and used to support investigational studies for persons living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Availability of a standardized, remote-use version of the ALSFRS-R may promote more inclusive, decentralized clinical trials. A scoping literature review was conducted to identify existing remote-use ALSFRS-R tools, synthesize feasibility and comparability of administration modes, and summarize barriers and facilitators to inform development of a standardized remote-use ALSFRS-R tool. Methods: Included studies reported comparisons between remote and in-person, clinicianreported, ALSFRS-R administration and were published in English (20 02-2022). References were identified by searching peer-reviewed and gray literature. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed to compare findings within and across modes of administration. Results: Remote modes of ALSFRS-R administration were categorized into 4 nonmutually exclusive categories: telephone (n = 6), videoconferencing (n = 3), computer or online platforms (n = 3), mobile applications and wearables (n = 2), and 1 unspecified telemedicine modality (n = 1). Studies comparing in-person to telephone or videoconferencing administration reported high ALSFRS-R rating correlations and nonsignificant between-mode differences. Conclusions: There is insufficient information in the ALSFRS-R literature to support remote clinician administration for collecting high quality data. Future research should engage persons living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, care partners, and providers to develop a standardized remote-use