RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Quality of life in hormone receptor–positive HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients during treatment with letrozole alone or in combination with lapatinib
Sherrill, E., Amonkar, MM., Sherif, B., Maltzman, J., O'Rourke, L., & Johnston, S. (2010). Quality of life in hormone receptor–positive HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients during treatment with letrozole alone or in combination with lapatinib. Oncologist, 15(9), 944-953. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0012
The article discusses results from the clinical trial EGF30008 that studied the combination of letrozole plus lapatinib in metastatic breast cancer treatment.
The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the independent peer reviewers.
Background. A phase III trial compared lapatinib plus letrozole (L + Let) with letrozole plus placebo (Let) as first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients whose tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2+ was significantly longer for L + Let than for Let (8.2 months versus 3 months; p = .019). This analysis focuses on quality of life (QOL) in the HER-2+ population.
Methods. QOL was assessed at screening, every 12 weeks, and at withdrawal using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT–B). Changes from baseline were analyzed and the proportions of patients achieving minimally important differences in QOL scores were compared. Additional exploratory analyses evaluated how QOL changes reflected tumor progression status.
Results. Among the 1,286 patients randomized, 219 had HER-2+ tumors. Baseline QOL scores were comparable in the two arms. Mean changes in QOL scores were generally stable over time for patients who stayed on study. The average change from baseline on the FACT-B total score in both arms was positive at all scheduled visits through week 48. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms in the percentage of QOL responders.
Conclusion. The addition of lapatinib to letrozole led to a significantly longer PFS interval while maintaining QOL during treatment, when compared with letrozole alone, thus confirming the clinical benefit of the combination therapy in the HR+ HER-2+ MBC patient population. This all oral regimen provides an effective option in this patient population, delaying the need for chemotherapy and its accompanying side effects.