RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
A qualitative study of obstacles to diaphragm and condom use in an HIV prevention trial in Sub-Saharan Africa
Kacanek, D., Dennis, A., Sahin-Hodoglugil, NN., Montgomery, E., Morar, N., Mtetwa, S., Nkala, B., Phillip, J., Watadzaushe, C., & Van Der Straten, A. (2012). A qualitative study of obstacles to diaphragm and condom use in an HIV prevention trial in Sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Education and Prevention, 24(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2012.24.1.54
Consistent condom use and the substitution of condoms with potential HIV prevention methods of lower or unknown effectiveness are important concerns in the development of new prevention technologies. This qualitative study explored obstacles to consistent condom use with the diaphragm in MIRA, an HIV prevention trial in South Africa and Zimbabwe. We conducted 26 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 206 women and 7 FGDs and 10 in-depth interviews with 41 male partners of intervention-arm women. The belief that the diaphragm/gel prevented HIV, women's difficulties negotiating condom use, and men's unawareness that using the products together was recommended were obstacles to consistent condom use with the diaphragm/gel. Concerns about protection from HIV and pregnancy, recognition that the diaphragm was not yet proven to prevent HIV or sexually transmitted infections, and the trial context were facilitators. Understanding selective study product use in HIV prevention trials may inform improved adherence counseling and male involvement strategies
