RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives
Eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation
Marcial, L. H., Johnston, D. S., Shapiro, M. R., Jacobs, S. R., Blumenfeld, B., & Rojas Smith, L. (2019). A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: Eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation. JAMIA Open, 2(1), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz002
Objectives: To illustrate key contextual factors that may have effects on clinical decision support (CDS) adoption and, ultimately, success.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a qualitative evaluation of 2 similar radiology CDS innovations for near-term endpoints affecting adoption and present the findings using an evaluation framework. We identified key contextual factors between these 2 innovations and determined important adoption differences between them.
Results: Degree of electronic health record integration, approach to education and training, key drivers of adoption, and tailoring of the CDS to the clinical context were handled differently between the 2 innovations, contributing to variation in their relative degrees of adoption and use. Attention to these factors had impacts on both near and later-term measures of success (eg, patient outcomes).
Discussion: CDS adoption is a well-studied early-term measure of CDS success that directly impacts outcomes. Adoption requires attention throughout the design phases of an intervention especially to key factors directly affecting it, including how implementation across multiple sites and systems complicates adoption, which prior experience with CDS matters, and that practice guidelines invariably require tailoring to the clinical context.
Conclusion: With better planning for the capture of early-term measures of successful CDS implementation, especially adoption, critical adjustments may be made to ensure that the CDS is effectively implemented to be successful.
