RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
A national hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation trial
UV4me2 intervention costs and impact on young adult skin cancer risk behaviors
Heckman, C., Lin, Y., Khavjou, O., Manne, S., Mitarotondo, A., Yaroch, A., Bhurosy, T., Niu, Z., Riley, M., & Glanz, K. (2021). A national hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation trial: UV4me2 intervention costs and impact on young adult skin cancer risk behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28(SUPPL 1), S10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-09997-7
Background: Young adults engage in risky ultraviolet radiation (UV) exposure, both solar and artificial, and minimal sun protection. Melanoma is one of the most common cancers among young adults, particularly women. We developed UV4me, which is an online sun safety intervention for at-risk individuals 18-25 years old. Methods: After establishing initial efficacy, we have since completed a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation trial. Participants for the hybrid trial were recruited primarily using paid ads on social media. 1691 participants completed baseline surveys and were randomized to one of three intervention conditions: the original UV4me, enhanced UV4me2 with more interactive and engaging features, or e-pamphlet education control. Results: UV4me2 demonstrated better outcomes than the e-pamphlet for wearing facial sunscreen at 12 weeks, overall sun protection weeks 12-52, habitual (automatic) sun protection at 12-24 weeks, and skin self-examination at 52 weeks (70% retention). UV4me2 performed better than the e-pamphlet for overall UV exposure at 24 weeks, but this trend was not significant (p = 0.056). Significant differences were not found comparing UV4me2 to UV4me. When considering implementation costs after initial “sunk costs” for intervention development, and estimating costs for larger samples (e.g., >1000 individuals), costs are similar across the intervention conditions (USD$12-16 per person). Additional analyses will focus on intervention engagement, satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: These results are some of the first outcomes reported for a dissemination trial for a skin cancer prevention intervention. Successful behavioral interventions for young adults may lead to future reduction in their risks of and morbidity from skin cancer.
6th International Congress of Behavioral Medicine, Brisbane, Australia (15–18 November, 2000).