RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Geospatial Analytics to Evaluate Point-of-Dispensing Sites for Mass Immunizations in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Everett, K., Potter, MA., Wheaton, W., Gleason, SM., Brown, ST., & Lee, BY. (2013). Geospatial Analytics to Evaluate Point-of-Dispensing Sites for Mass Immunizations in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 19(Suppl. 2), S31-S36. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182941a5a
CONTEXT: Public health agencies use mass immunization locations to quickly administer vaccines to protect a population against an epidemic. The selection of such locations is frequently determined by available staffing levels and in some places, not all potential sites can be opened, often because of a lack of resources. Public health agencies need assistance in determining which n sites are the prime ones to open given available staff to minimize travel time and travel distance for those in the population who need to get to a site to receive treatment. OBJECTIVE: Employ geospatial analytical methods to identify the prime n locations from a predetermined set of potential locations (eg, schools) and determine which locations may not be able to achieve the throughput necessary to reach the herd immunity threshold based on varying R0 values. DESIGN: Spatial location-allocation algorithms were used to select the ideal n mass vaccination locations. SETTING: Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, served as the study area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The most favorable sites were selected and the number of individuals required to be vaccinated to achieve the herd immunity threshold for a given R0, ranging from 1.5 to 7, was determined. Locations that did not meet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention throughput recommendation for smallpox were identified. RESULTS: At R0 = 1.5, all mass immunization locations met the required throughput to achieve the herd immunity threshold within 5 days. As R0s increased from 2 to 7, an increasing number of sites were inadequate to meet throughput requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the top n sites and categorizing those with throughput challenges allows health departments to adjust staffing, shift length, or the number of sites. This method has the potential to be expanded to select immunization locations under a number of additional scenarios