RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
The foundation and re-emergence of classical thought in criminological theory
A brief philosophical history
Paternoster, R., & Fisher, D. (2017). The foundation and re-emergence of classical thought in criminological theory: A brief philosophical history. In R. A. Triplett (Ed.), The Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Criminology (pp. 173-188). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011385.ch10
This chapter pays homage to the history that has become popularly known as the classical school of criminology. It begins with a brief discussion of the early philosophical history of classical criminology and its origins not so much in Beccaria, but in both the French Encyclopedists and the English moral philosophers and free thinkers. The bulk of attention will be devoted to the reappearance of classical theory assumptions since the late 1960s in the form of deterrence, routine activities, and rational choice theory. The most general of the decision-based theories is taken, with rational choice theory with deterrence and routine activities theories as more specific variations of rational choice theory. Regardless of any subtle differences, all these theories share the common assumption that offending is a matter of choice based upon the anticipated costs and benefits of the action, and so all are premised on classical criminology.