RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Building global capacity to conduct pathology-based postmortem examination
Establishing a new training hub for minimally invasive tissue sampling
Paganelli, C. R., Parlberg, L., Goco, N. J., Ritter, J. M., Martines, R. B., Zaki, S. R., Walong, E., Ochieng, W., Inyangala, D., Barake, W., Wachiury, C., Rakislova, N., Marimon, L., Ferrando, M., Ordi, J., & Mcclure, E. (2021). Building global capacity to conduct pathology-based postmortem examination: Establishing a new training hub for minimally invasive tissue sampling. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 73(5), S390-S395. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab765
Background Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), an alternative to complete diagnostic autopsy, is a pathology-based postmortem examination that has been validated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and can provide accurate cause of death information when used with other data. The MITS Surveillance Alliance was established in 2017 with the goal to expand MITS globally by increasing training capacity, accessibility, and availability in LMICs. Between January 2019 and May 2020, the MITS Surveillance Alliance convened a multidisciplinary team of technical advisors to attain this goal.
Methods This article describes the process used to develop criteria and identify an optimal location for a MITS training hub, establish a cadre of LMIC-based trainers, refine standardized MITS sample collection protocols, develop a training program, and release a telepathology platform for quality assessment of MITS histological samples.
Results Results include the creation of a training hub and curriculum, with a total of 9 pathologists and technicians trained as part of the training of the trainers. Those trainers trained 15 participants from seven MITS projects representing 6 LMICs trained in MITS sample collection. The 15 participants have gone on to train more than 50 project-level staff in MITS sample collection.
Conclusions Lessons learned include an appreciation for using an iterative process for establishing standardized procedures, creating opportunities for all stakeholders to deliver critical feedback, and highlighting the importance of complementing in-person trainings with ongoing technical assistance.
